EB-1A Dismissed โ Genetics (2017): did not meet the minimum of three required evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum of three required evidentiary criteria. Although the Director found the petitioner met the criteria for judging and authorship of scholarly articles, the AAO concluded that the petitioner did not demonstrate that his work constituted original contributions of major significance. The evidence, including citation records and media mentions, was found insufficient to prove his work had a major impact rising to the top of the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.