EB-1A Dismissed โ Healthcare Delivery (2018): did not establish he met the required three evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that he met the required three evidentiary criteria. The Director had conceded two criteria (published material and leading role), but the AAO found the petitioner did not prove his business contributions were of 'major significance' to the field as a whole. The evidence showed his innovative clinic model was a 'first-of-its-kind' business, but its impact had not yet extended beyond a local level or demonstrated a significant influence on the broader field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.