EB-1A Dismissed โ Immunology And Food Allergy (2020): did not meet the minimum of three required evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum of three required evidentiary criteria. While the AAO agreed that the petitioner met the criteria for judging the work of others and for authorship of scholarly articles, it found her evidence was insufficient to establish that her work constituted original contributions of major significance to the field. The AAO concluded that high citation counts and comparative rankings alone did not demonstrate the broader impact required for this criterion.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.