Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Insect And Pest Control Research (2017): did not meet at least three of the required evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. While the petitioner was found to have met the criteria for judging the work of others and for authorship of scholarly articles, he did not sufficiently document that his patents and research constituted original contributions of major significance. The evidence did not demonstrate that his work was widely cited, broadly implemented, or had otherwise significantly impacted the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.