EB-1A Dismissed โ Interior Design (2024): did not establish the beneficiary met the initial evidence
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary met the initial evidence requirements for an alien of extraordinary ability. The Director originally found the evidence did not satisfy a one-time major award or at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The AAO concurred, determining the evidence submitted, such as the beneficiary's role at industry trade shows, was not sufficient to meet criteria like judging the work of others.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.