Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Law (2014): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit new facts to address the deficiencies identified in the previous denial. The AAO found that the evidence provided for the membership, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role criteria was either not new or insufficient to meet the regulatory standards. Consequently, the petitioner did not meet the heavy burden required for a motion to reopen, and the underlying petition remained denied.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Membership In Associations Requiring Outstanding Achievement Publication Of Scholarly Articles Performance In A Leading Or Critical Role
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.