EB-1A Dismissed โ Legal Scholarship (2019): the motion to reconsider was denied because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reconsider was denied because the petitioner failed to establish that the previous AAO decision was incorrect. The petitioner did not prove their membership in an association required outstanding achievements, that their scholarly contributions were of major significance, or that their role was leading or critical for the organization as a whole rather than just a committee. New evidence submitted with the motion was not considered, as is standard for a motion to reconsider.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.