EB-1A Dismissed โ Life And Environmental Science (2019): did not establish he met at least three of the ten
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he met at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. While the Director and the AAO agreed he met the judging criterion, they found his student awards and fellowships did not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prizes. The petitioner failed to establish eligibility under other claimed criteria, thus not demonstrating sustained acclaim or that he is at the top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.