Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Life Sciences: did not establish the beneficiary's sustained national or
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary's sustained national or international acclaim. The AAO determined that the submitted evidence, including recommendation letters and patents, did not prove the beneficiary's contributions were of major significance to the field as a whole. Specifically, the influence of the beneficiary's work and patents was asserted but not supported by sufficient independent, documentary evidence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role For Distinguished Organizations High Salary Or Other High Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.