dismissed EB-1A

dismissed EB-1A Case: Life Sciences

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Life Sciences

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary's sustained national or international acclaim. The AAO determined that the submitted evidence, including recommendation letters and patents, did not prove the beneficiary's contributions were of major significance to the field as a whole. Specifically, the influence of the beneficiary's work and patents was asserted but not supported by sufficient independent, documentary evidence.

Criteria Discussed

Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role For Distinguished Organizations High Salary Or Other High Remuneration

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.

Start a Stronger Draft →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.