EB-1A Dismissed โ Material Chemistry (2018): did not meet minimum of three evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required minimum of three evidentiary criteria. While the petitioner met the criteria for judging the work of others and authorship of scholarly articles, the AAO concluded that the evidence did not demonstrate that his work constituted original contributions of major significance to his field. The submitted testimonial letters indicated potential future impact rather than a realized, significant influence on the field as a whole at the time of filing.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.