EB-1A Dismissed โ Materials And Science Engineering (2024): did not establish eligibility for at least three of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility for at least three of the required regulatory criteria. While the petitioner met the criteria for judging and authorship of scholarly articles, the AAO concluded that he did not establish that his original contributions were of major significance to his field as a whole. The record lacked sufficient evidence that others in the field had utilized his findings in a way that resulted in a significant impact.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.