Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Materials Science (2020): did not meet at least three of the required evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO agreed with the Director that the petitioner only met two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), finding that published material was not primarily about the petitioner and the evidence did not establish that her original contributions were of major significance to the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Petitioner Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.