Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Mathematical Research (2022): even though the beneficiary satisfied at least three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because even though the beneficiary satisfied at least three initial evidentiary criteria, the AAO concluded in its final merits determination that the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The petitioner failed to show that the beneficiary's achievements, such as peer-reviewing a small number of papers, placed him among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.