EB-1A Dismissed โ Mechanical Engineering (2003): did not establish the submitted evidence met the regulatory
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the submitted evidence met the regulatory criteria for the claimed field. Evidence of his membership in a legislative body and published articles about his political activities were deemed irrelevant to his claimed field of extraordinary ability as a mechanical engineering researcher. Furthermore, evidence of judging others was considered part of his normal duties as a professor and not indicative of sustained acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.