EB-1A Dismissed โ Medicine (2017): did not establish eligibility for at least three of the ten
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility for at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. While the Director credited the petitioner with meeting two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), the AAO found on appeal that the petitioner did not meet additional claimed criteria, such as memberships. The AAO concluded that the petitioner's fellowship and board certification did not require 'outstanding achievements' as judged by experts, but were rather based on meeting standard professional requirements.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.