EB-1A Dismissed โ Medicine (2006): did not establish the sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner did not establish the sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification. Although the petitioner satisfied the criterion for published materials, the AAO determined that the evidence submitted was insufficient to demonstrate original contributions of major significance. The supporting letters were deemed anecdotal or from immediate colleagues, and there was no citation evidence to show her research had a widespread impact on the medical field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.