EB-1A Dismissed โ Molecular Biology (2018): did not meet the minimum three out of ten evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum three out of ten evidentiary criteria required for the classification. The Director had already credited the petitioner with meeting the criteria for judging the work of others and authoring scholarly articles. However, the AAO determined that the petitioner did not sufficiently demonstrate that his original scientific contributions were of major significance to the field, as the evidence of citations did not prove widespread impact or substantial influence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.