EB-1A Dismissed โ Molecular Carcinogenesis (2005): did not establish sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim. The evidence submitted under the 'awards' criterion, such as research grants, academic scholarships, and research fellowships, was determined not to be prizes or awards for excellence but rather funding for future research, support for students, or a form of employment. Other honors were considered too old to demonstrate sustained acclaim or lacked evidence of national significance.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.