Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Nanostructure Material Synthesis And Electrochemistry (2019): did not meet minimum of three evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required minimum of three evidentiary criteria. Although the Director acknowledged the petitioner met the criteria for judging the work of others and for authorship of scholarly articles, the AAO determined that the evidence submitted did not establish that his original contributions were of major significance in the field. The AAO found that while his work was cited, the record did not demonstrate it was widely implemented or had remarkably impacted the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.