dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Not Specified
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected as improperly filed. The attorney representing the petitioner filed the appeal but failed to include a new, properly executed Form G-28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance). Without this form, the attorney lacked legal standing to file the appeal, and the form lacked the required signature from the petitioner, rendering the appeal invalid.
Criteria Discussed
Improperly Filed Appeal Missing Form G-28 (Notice Of Entry Of Appearance) Lack Of Legal Standing To File
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 20577737 Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: MAR. 10, 2022 Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Extraordinary Ability) The Petitioner seeks classification as an individual of extraordinary ability. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b )(1 )(A), 8 U.S.C . ยง l 153(b Xl)(A). This first preference classification makes immigrant visas available to those who can demonstrate their extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in their field through extensive documentation. The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner had satisfied only two of the ten initial evidentiary criteria, of which he must meet at least three. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). In these proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit. See Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. As set forth below, we will reject the appeal. The record reflects that attornevl I who represented the Petitioner in the prior filing of Form I-140, filed Form I-290B (Notice of Appeal or Motion) . However, her Form I-290B was not accompanied by the required Form G-28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative). 1 Although we sent a notice tol I informing her that we considered the Petitioner to be self-represented in the appeal proceeding because she did not submit a properly executed Form G-28l did not respond to our notice. 2 Accordingly, the appeal itself must be rejected as improperly filed. Part 4, Section A of Form I-290B (Applicant's or Petitioner's Statement, Contact Information, Certification , and Signature) instructs the filer of an appeal based on an application or petition filed by an individual to complete this section. provided her information and signed her name in the Petitioner's signature box (subsection A.8.a). However , without a properly executed Form G-28, Form I-290B lacks the requisite signature from an 1 Although! indicated onFormI-290BthatForm G-28 was attached, the record does not reflect that Form G-28 was submitted with the appeal. 2 In contrast to theappealnowbefore us, the Petitioner's initialfilingofFonn I-140 was accompanied by Form G-28 that was properly signed by both and the Petitioner. ThatFonn G-28, however, is not valid for the subsequent appeal of the Director 's denial decision, which requires the filing of a new Fonn G-28. See 8 C.F.R. ยงยง 103 .3(a)(2)(v)(A)(2)(i) and 292.4(a). authorized signatory. 3 Moreover, the absence of a proper signature invalidates the contents of the "Petitioner's Certification" that appears above the signature, in particular the closing sentence which reads, in pe1iinent part, as follows: "I ce1iify, under penalty of perjury, that I have reviewed this form ... and all of this information is complete, true, and correct." In the alternative, we cannot consider the appeal filed by the Petitioner because the form does not contain his information and his signature, certifying that the information therein is complete, true, and correct. In fact, there is no evidence that the PetitionerreviewedFonn I-290B. Here, the only signature on Form I-290B is that of ,I who is not the "affected party" in this proceeding, notwithstanding her initial representation of the Petitioner, and therefore does not have legal standing to file the appeal. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(iii)(B). Further, the regulation at 8 C.F.R ยง 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(l) states that "[a]n appeal filed by a person or entity not entitled to file it must be rejected as improperly filed. In such a case, any filing fee the Service has accepted will not be retumed."4 Since ldidnot submit a properly executed Form G-28 with the appeal and the Petitioner did not file the appeal as the "affected party" in this proceeding, we will reject the appeal. ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 3 The instructions for Form I-290B state that "[e]very form MUST contain the signature of the applicant orpetitioner(or parent, legal guardian, or authorized signatory, if applicable). See https://www.uscis.gov/i290b (last visited March 10, 2022). 4 The regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง I 03.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(2)(i) further provides that "[i]f an appeal is filed by an attorney or representative without a properly executedNoticeofEntry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative(Forrn G-28) entitling that person to file the appeal, the appeal is considered improperly filed. In such case any filing fee the Service has accepted will not be refunded regardless ofthe action taken." 2
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.