Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Oil And Gas (2023): the motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required number of criteria. New evidence submitted for the 'original contributions' criterion post-dated the petition's filing and was not considered. The evidence for the 'high salary' criterion did not demonstrate that the petitioner's wages were high in relation to others in the specific oil and gas industry in Texas.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Original Contributions Of Major Significance Leading Or Critical Role High Salary Or Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.