Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Oil And Gas (2022): did not establish they met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate they met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. While the Director and AAO agreed the petitioner met the criteria for judging and authorship of scholarly articles, they found the evidence did not establish original contributions of major significance, a leading or critical role, or a high salary.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Participation As A Judge Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Performance Of A Leading Or Critical Role For Distinguished Entities High Salary Or Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.