dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Opera
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen or reconsider was denied because it was filed untimely. The motion was received 34 days after the unfavorable decision was served, exceeding the 33-day filing deadline.
Criteria Discussed
Timeliness Of Motion
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF M-K-L-S- Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: OCT. 26, 2016 MOTION ON ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE DECISION PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 'J The Petitioner, an opera singer, seeks classification as an "alien of extraordinary ability" in the arts. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(1)(A), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(A). The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the petition and we dismissed the subsequent appeal. The matter is now before us on a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider. 1 Upon review, we will ยท deny the motion as untimely filed. A motion must be~ filed within 33 calendar days ofthe date that the unfavorable decision was served by mail. 8 C.F.R. ยงยง 103.5(a)(l)(i); 103.8(b). The filing date is the day USCIS receives the motion at the designated filing location, not the date the Petitioner mailed the p10tion. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(a)(7)(i). On August 11, 2016, we dismissed the Petitioner's underlying appeal and served the unfavorable decision by mail. The decision stated that the Petitioner may file a motion within 33 days. USCIS received the motion, styled as a second appeal, on September 14, 2016, which is 34 days after the service date of the unfavorable decision. We initially rejected this Form I-290B administratively because the Appellant sent the Form I-290B to an improper filing location. However, for the purposes of determining whether this Form I-290B, ultimately filed on September 29, 2016, was filed timely we are treating it as if it were properly filed on September 14,2016. Because that date is more than 33 days after the unfavorable decision date, we are denying the motion as untimely filed. ORDER: The motion to reopen or reconsider is denied. Cite as Matter of M-K-L-S-, ID# 174196 (AAO Oct. 26, 2016) 1 The Appellant indicated on the Form I-2908 that the form is filed as an appeal to the AAO. However, because the decision under review is a dismissed appeal this review would be a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider. Because this Form I-2908 is filed untimely, regardless of whether itjs filed as a motion or an appeal, we need not clarify whether the Form I-2908 is filed as a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.