EB-1A Dismissed โ Orthopedics (2019): did not meet three evidentiary criteria for an individual
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required three evidentiary criteria for an individual of extraordinary ability. While the Director credited the petitioner for meeting the 'judging' and 'scholarly articles' criteria, the AAO found the evidence insufficient to establish 'contributions of major significance' or a 'leading or critical role', concluding the work, though novel, had not yet achieved major significance or widespread impact in the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.