dismissed EB-1A Case: Photography

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF R-S-
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: NOV. 16,2017 
APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-140. IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a photographer, seeks classification as an individual of extraordinary ability in the 
arts. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section203(b)(l)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(I)(A). 
This first preference classification makes immigrant visas available to those who can demonstrate 
their extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim and vvhose 
achievements have been recognized in their field through extensive documentation. 
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien 
Worker, concluding that the Petitioner did not satisfy, as required. at least three of the ten initial 
evidentiary criteria. 
On appeal, the Petitioner submits a brief and additional documentation, stating that he meets at least 
three of the ten criteria. In addition, he maintains that he has established eligibility for the 
classification. 
Upon de novo review, we will dismiss the appeal. 
I. LAW 
Section 203(b)(l )(A) of the Act makes visas available to qualified f(Jreign nationals \Vith 
extraordinary ability if: 
(i) the alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education. business, or 
athletics which has been demonstrated by sustained national or international 
acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in the field through 
extensive documentation, 
(ii) the alien seeks to enter the United States to continue work 111 the area of 
extraordinary ability, and 
(iii) the alien's entry into the United States will substantially benefit prospectively the 
United States. 
Maller of R-S-
The term "extraordinary ability'' refers only to those individuals in ··that small percentage who have 
risen to the very top of the field of endeavor." 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(2). The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(h)(3) sets forth two options for satisfying this classification's initial evidence 
requirements. First. a petitioner can demonstrate a one-time achievement (that is a major. 
internationally recognized award). If that petitioner does not submit this evidence. then he or she 
must provide documentation that meets at least three of the ten criteria listed at 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x) (including items such as awards, published material in certain media. and 
scholarly articles). 
Where a petitioner meets these initial evidence requirements, we then consider the totality of the 
material in a final merits determination and assess whether the record shows sustained national or 
international acclaim and demonstrates that the individual is among the small percentage at the very 
top ofthe field ofendeavor. See Kazarian v. USCJS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing a 
two-part review where the documentation is first counted and then. if fulfilling the required number 
of criteria. considered in the context of a final merits determination): see also Visinscaia r. Beers. 
4 F. Supp. 3d 126, 131-32 (D.D.C. 2013); Rijal v. USCIS. 772 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (W.O. Wash. 2011 ). 
This two-step analysis is consistent with our holding that the "truth is to be determined not by the 
quantity of evidence alone but by its quality," as well as the principle that we examine "each piece of 
evidence for relevance, probative value, and credibility. both individually and within the context of 
the totality of the evidence, to determine whether the fact to be proven is probably true:· l'vfaller o( 
Chawathe. 25 I&N Dec. 369, 376 (AAO 2010). 
II. ANALYSIS 
The Petitioner is a fashion and glamour photographer, 1 who seeks to enter the United States to work 
for a Maryland business specialized in wedding photography. As he has not stated or established his 
receipt of a major, internationally recognized award, as initial evidence. he must present documents 
satisfying at least three of the ten criteria under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3 )(i)-(x). Upon a review of the 
record in its entirety, we find that he has satisfied one criterion relating to the display of his work at 
artistic exhibitions. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3 )(vii). He, however, has not satisfied the initial 
evidentiary requirement of meeting at least three of the ten criteria. 
Documentation qlfhe alien's receipt olfesscr nationally or internationally recognized prizes or 
awardsfor excellence in the field ofendcavor. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3 )(i). 
The Director determined that the Petitioner did not meet this criterion. The record supports this 
finding. Specifically, while the Petitioner has submitted documentation showing that a number of 
organizations honored him, he has not established that these accolades constitute nationally or 
internationally recognized awards or prizes. On appeal, he has not challenged the Director's 
determination or presented qualifying evidence. He therefore has not satisfied this criterion. 
1 
The Petitioner explained in his response to the Director's request for evidence that ·'glamour photography is a genre of 
photography wherein subjects are portrayed in erotic poses ranging from fully clothed to nude." 
2 
.
Matter of R-S-
Documentation o{the alien's membership in associations in the fieldfhr which classification is 
sought, which require outstanding achievements of' their members, as judged b_v recognized 
national or international experts in their disciplines orfield\·. 8 C.F.R. ~ 204.5(h)(3 )(ii). 
On appeal, the Petitioner maintains that he meets this criterion because he is a member of the 
and the While he has submitted 
documents verifying his membership, he has not ottered evidence showing how he became a 
member or confirming that he did so after recognized national or international experts judged his 
outstanding achievements. 
According to a December 2015 statement from the Petitioner 
is "a well renowned glamour photographer in Nepal" and "introduce[ d) glamour photography [to] 
Nepal." The document however. does not point to any evidence substantiating these claims. More 
importantly, as relating to this criterion, the statement does not explain how the Petitioner became a 
member, or if the organization requires outstanding achievements of its members as judged by 
qualifying experts. 
In addition, the record includes a March 2017 letter from the confirming 
the Petitioner's membership. The letter states that the association relies on a panel of "senior and 
prominent public personalities [in] the film and journalism sector'' to review membership 
applications, and that it only admits professionals who have at least five years of experience and who 
have "contributed greatly to their respective fields.'' The document, however, does not discuss the 
types of qualifying contributions or explain if they rise to the level of "outstanding achievements," as 
specified in the regulation. 
The letter from the notes that it admitted the Petitioner as a member 
because his "photographs have played a key role in introducing and establishing many new talents" 
and that he "goes out of his way to promote deserving talents supporting them even on a person 
level" and, finally, that "artists consider it an honor to work with and be photographed by ]him]." 
Neither the Petitioner nor the letter, however, explains how the aforementioned events constitute 
"outstanding achievements." While the letter states that the Petitioner has made "long standing and 
pioneering contributions'' to the field and that his "contribution ... is one of a kind and cannot be 
compared to none other,'' it does not point to evidence that substantiates such broad statements. 
Finally, the Petitioner is a member of other organizations, including the 
and the 
He offers letters from these entities praising his achievements as a photographer. but does not 
present documents, such as the organizations' bylaws or membership applications, that confirm that 
these associations require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized 
national or international experts. As such, he has not satisfied this criterion. 
.
Matter of R-S-
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major 
media, relating to the alien's H•ork in thefieldfiH' ·which classification is sought. Such evidence 
shall include the title. date. and author qfthe material. and any necessary translation. 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(h)(3)(iii). 
While the Director concluded that the Petitioner met this criterion, the record does not support this 
finding. The Petitioner has offered a number of articles about him, relating to his work as a 
photographer. He, however, has not submitted sufficient documents demonstrating that the articles 
appeared in professional or major trade publications or other major media. 
The Petitioner has presented articles that appeared in newspapers, magazines, and websites, 
including 
and 
He, however, has not offered sufficient evidence demonstrating that these 
publishers constitute professional or major trade publications or other major media. 
The record contains information on some of the publishers, but not others. For example. the 
Petitioner has presented a online printout, indicating that both and 
are English-language publications in Nepal. He. however. has not offered 
circulation data on these two general interest newspapers. which is relevant to whether they 
constitute major media. In addition, according to a U.S. State Department document. which the 
Petitioner has submitted, most people in Nepal speak Nepali and regional and indigenous languages. 
The record does not reveal the percentage of the population that read English newspapers. which is 
relevant in determining whether English-language newspapers constitute major media in Nepal. 
The Petitioner has also submitted an August 2014 document from indicating 
that publications such as and 
have an "A" classification "based on standards." Neither the document nor other evidence in 
the record explains how a publication attains the "A" classification or includes circulation 
information. The record has some information on and but does not establish 
that these English-language magazines are qualifying publications under the criterion. In light of the 
above, specifically, the lack of sutlicient documentation confirming that the newspapers, magazines. 
and websites qualify as professional or major trade publications or other major media. the Petitioner 
has not satisfied this criterion. 
Evidence of the alien's participation. either individually or on a panel. as ajudge oft he work of 
others in the same or an alliedfield ofspecificationfor ·which classificathm is sought. 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(h )(3 )(iv ). 
On appeal, the Petitioner states that he meets this criterion because he was a judge for a number of 
beauty pageants, including the 2012 event. during which he selected the 
wmner. The record is insufficient to demonstrate that he satisfies this criterion. 
According to a letter from the Petitioner was on the panel that selected her as 
4 
.
Matter of R-S-
at the 2012 The Petitioner, however, has not submitted documents. 
such as a letter or statement from the event organizers, confirming or his involvement in 
the event. 
Regardless, assuming the Petitioner did evaluate contestants in the 2012 he has 
not shown that he judged the work of others in photography or an allied field. indicates 
that the "title of is of great importance to any aspiring model or film artist as it 
endorses the aspirant's competence in the desired field." A letter from a 
creative consultant, states that as a judge. the Petitioner had to "envision the contestant's aptitude 
and ability to contribute to the glamour sector.., Statements from both and 
illustrate that the judges assessed the contestants' abilities. The Petitioner has not presented 
documents demonstrating that beauty pageants, modeling or film acting are allied to the field of 
photography. In addition, the record does not establish that the Petitioner judged the work of the 
photographers. Rather, he evaluated the appearance or competence of the pageant contestants to 
select a wmner. 
In addition to the 20 12 
including the 2015 
the Petitioner has judged other beauty contests. 
the 20 15 and the 
events. While the record illustrates that he has participated as a judge in these pageants. 
it does not establish that he judged the work of photographers or people in an allied field. As such. 
he has not satisfied this criterion. 
Evidence l~l the alien's original scient(fic. scholarZv. artistic. athletic. or business-related 
contributions olmajor significance in thefield. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v). 
On appeal, the Petitioner indicates that he has worked with show organizers. models, artists. and 
celebrities in Nepal, who have offered their support for his petition. In his response to the Director's 
request for evidence, he stated that he "broke the glass ceiling of Nepal photography by launching 
the the first of its kind, featuring 12 top-ranking actresses and 
models.'' He also claimed in his initial tiling that he "introduced the concept of post cards. posters 
and calendars featuring models [and] actors in Nepal.'' Some of his references called him Nepal's 
first glamour photographer. Although the record shows that he is an experienced photographer. it 
does not support a finding that he has made contributions of major significance in the field. 
The Petitioner shot photographs for the which 
called it ' The record. however. does not illustrate how the 
calendar has inf1uenced the field of fashion and glamour photography. The article 
explains that the calendar "is sponsored by · and ''has 11 beauties 
gracing each month of the Nepali year.'' It further notes, ''the calendar is not for sale but for 
complimentary distribution by and Even assuming this was 
Nepal's first calendar that used glamour photographs. the Petitioner has not shown how it has 
affected the field. For example, the record does not include evidence demonstrating that a high 
number of photographers worked on or published glamour calendars because of the Petitioner's 
.
Matter qf R-S-
work. Further, he has not explained how the calendar's intluence nses to the level of "major 
significance in the field." 
Similarly, even assuming that the Petitioner was the first glamour photographer in Nepal and had 
"introduced the concept of post cards. posters and calendars featuring models [and] actors:· the 
record does not sufficiently demonstrate his impact in the field as a whole. or confirm that his 
influence qualifies as "major significance.·· Being the first to enter a tield or to complete certain 
work in a field might 
demonstrate originality of the Petitioner's work. but without more. it does not 
illustrate he has made contributions of major significance in the field. 
The record also contains documents verifying the Petitioner's receipt of awards. As discussed, these 
awards are not nationally or internationally recognized and do not satisfy the criterion under 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(h)(3)(i). Regardless, while these accolades recognize his work. they do not specifically 
explain what he has done that constitutes major significance in the field of photography. Likewise. 
while the Petitioner has received some 
media attention. which as discussed. does not meet the 
criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii). he has not shown that the published articles confirm that 
his photographs have had a significant impact in the field. 
The Petitioner has also offered other evidence, including a number of reference letters. These 
documents, however, do not demonstrate his work has impacted the field. For example, 
states that "[the Petitioner] gave his contribution to strengthen the 
glamour photography in Nepal.'' from the in 
New York, indicates that the Petitioner is "a prominent photographer from NepaL" who "has 25 
years of experience in photography and good command in digital photography." A number of 
people in the film industry, including 
praise the Petitioner for his photographs. While the letters in the record, including those not 
specifically mentioned, establish that he is an experienced photographer who has produced 
satisfactory work for his clients and employers, they are insufficient to demonstrate that his impact 
in the field rises to the level of "major significance." See Visinscaia. 4 F. Supp. 3d at 135-36 (to 
meet this criterion, a petitioner must demonstrate impact beyond his or her clients or employers). 
Moreover, the Petitioner has submitted a number of reference letters that include the following 
identical passages when discussing his contributions in the field. 
[The Petitioner] is a truly exceptional glamour photographer. Anyone and everyone 
in the tilm industry is aware of his works and contributions to the industry. He is the 
pioneer of glamour photography in Nepal and is continually working and producing 
exceptional results till [sic] date. He has inspired many to pursue a career in glamour 
photography .... 
. . . He is extremely popular and has worked extensively with both established and 
aspiring actors and models. His work has been instrumental in launching many new 
faces in the film and glamour industry. One of his first discoveries was actress 
.
Matter of R-S-
who went on to achieve popularity and success in the Nepali tilm 
industry. There are many more names in the industry today who owe their break to 
[the Petitioner]. He is also instrumental in establishing the trend of p01ifolio photo 
shoots and product photo shoots. He is undoubtedly the highest paid photographer in 
Nepal .... 
The abovementioned paragraphs appear in a number of reference letters, including those from 
the chairperson of the general 
secretary of the and the vice-chairperson of 
The use of identical language in letters from diverse persons raises 
concerns over the letters' authenticity and the source of their contents. Regardless. the letters do not 
specify how the Petitioner's contributions have had a major impact on the field of photography. 
The documents in the record, including those not specifically mentioned, primarily contain 
attestations of the Petitioner's status in the field without providing specific examples of how his 
contributions rise to a level consistent with major significance. Letters that repeat the regulatory 
language but do not explain how an individual's contributions have already influenced the field are 
insufficient to satisfy this criterion. Kazarian v. USCIS. 580 F.3d 1030. I 036 (9th Cir. 2009). affd 
in part, 596 F.3d at 1122. In 2010, the Kazarian court reiterated that the U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services' conclusion that the "letters from physics professors attesting to [a 
petitioner's] contributions in the field" were insufficient was "consistent 
with the relevant regulatory 
language." Moreover, we need not accept primarily conclusory statements. 1756. Inc. v. United 
States Att y Gen., 745 F. Supp. 9, 15 (D.D.C. 1990). For these reasons. the Petitioner has not met his 
burden of showing that he has made original contributions of major significance in the field. 
Evidence qf the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in the field. in professional or rnajor 
trade publications or other major media. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3 )(vi). 
The Director determined that the Petitioner did not meet this criterion and the record supports this 
finding. Specifically, while the Petitioner has submitted some evidence of his authorship, he has not 
established that his work constitutes "scholarly articles'· or has appeared in "professional or major 
trade publications or other major media." On appeal, he has not challenged the Director's finding or 
presented qualifying evidence. He therefore does not meet this criterion. 
Evidence of the dL\play qf the alien's work in the field at artisth· exhibitions or showcases. 
8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vii). 
The Director concluded that the Petitioner met this criterion. The record supports this finding. 
Specifically, the Petitioner has been a photographer for many years. and his work has appeared in 
lifestyle and fashion magazines, including and When publishing his photographs. 
these publications credited him as the photographer. He therefore meets this criterion . 
.., 
.
Matfer of R-S-
Evidence that the alien has peJformed in a leading or critical role j(Jr organizations or 
establishments that have a distinguished reputation. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(viii). 
On appeal, the Petitioner states that "he has played a leading or critical role for organizations in 
Nepali film industry, glamour industry and photography industry." His appellate brieL however. 
does not specifically name any of the organizations or explain what role he has performed for them 
that qualities as leading or critical. In addition, he has not pointed to any documents in the record 
verifying that these entities have a distinguished reputation, as required under the criterion. 
Documents in the record indicate that he has worked for a number of organizations. including 
a publisher; an event 
that recognizes and honors women in Nepal; a non-
governmental organization; and an 
organization for young leaders and entrepreneurs. He, however, has not shown that he performs a 
leading or critical role for these entities. In general, a leading role is evidenced from the role itself 
and a critical role is one in which a petitioner was responsible tor the success or standing of the 
organization or establishment. Although the Petitioner has worked as a photographer tor these 
entities, he has not demonstrated how he led them or was critical to their success or standing. 
Moreover, the record does not include sufficient documents, such as media reports, illustrating that 
these organizations have a distinguished reputation. As such, the Petitioner has not satisfied this 
criterion. 
Evidence that the alien has commanded a high sa/cay or other significantly high remuneration 
for services. in relation to others in the.field. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(ix). 
On appeal, the Petitioner indicates that "he undoubtedly is the highest paid photographer in Nepal." 
He argues that "various letters submitted," ·'the commercial success" of his work, and his ··contract 
with sufficiently demonstrate that he meets this criterion. We disagree. 
The Petitioner has presented a document from noting that in Nepal, the average 
monthly salary for someone in the "Advertising /Graphic Design/Event Management" field is 29.500 
Nepalese rupees (NPR). The record includes letters from the Petitioner's employers stating that his 
monthly income as a photographer and a photography teacher exceeds 29,500 NPR. He, however. 
has not demonstrated that "Advertising/Graphic Design/Event Management" properly describes his 
field, which is photography. Moreover , although he has offered a number of reference letters stating 
that he is the highest paid photographer in Nepal, neither he nor the letters point to evidence in the 
record that substantiates this claim. 
The record includes a letter from the director of 
stating that the Petitioner is "highly paid." "commanding a fee between 75,000 to I 00.000 [NPR] per 
project /photoshoot. " Although notes that he has worked with the Petitioner on projects. 
he does not specify how much he had paid the Petitioner, or explain how he learned of the 
Petitioner's fees. In addition, neither the letter nor other documents in the record reveal what 
.
Matter qf R-S-
constitutes "a high salary" or "other significantly high remuneration'' for a glamour and fashion 
photographer in Nepal, which 
is relevant in determining if the Petitioner meets this criterion. 
While the Petitioner urges us to consider his commercial success, he bas not offered relevant 
information on the revenues or profits he received from his \Vork. In addition, although the record 
includes a letter from indicating that the company hired the Petitioner to shoot its · 
which "was a big hit publicly:· the document does not specifically discuss his 
compensation or the commercial success of the calendar. Based on these reasons. the Petitioner has 
not shown that he satisfies this criterion. 
Evidence (~l commercial successes in the performing arts. as shown hy box office rece1jJts or 
record, cassette. compact disk, or video sales. 8 C.F.R. ~ 204.5(h)(3)(x). 
The Director determined that the Petitioner did not meet this criterion and the record supports this 
conclusion. Specifically, the Petitioner has not show·n that he is in a performing arts tield or that he 
has had commercial successes. On appeal, he does not challenge the Director's finding or offer 
qualifying evidence. He therefore does not meet this criterion. 
III. CONCLUSION 
The Petitioner is an experienced photographer who seeks to enter the United States to work f()r a 
business, specializing in wedding photography. Although he satisfies one criterion. he has not 
submitted the required initial evidence establishing that he meets at least three ofthe ten criteria. As 
a result, we need not provide the type of tina! merits determination referenced in Kazarian, 596 F.3d 
at 1119-20. Nevertheless, we have reviev,red the record in the aggregate, and conclude that it does 
not sufficiently demonstrate the Petitioner's sustained national or international acclaim or that his 
achievements have been recognized in the field through extensive documentation. Accordingly. he 
has not established he is an individual of extraordinary ability. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
Cite as Matter of R-S-, ID# 664599(AAO Nov. 16. 20 17) 
9