EB-1A Dismissed โ Physics (2006): did not establish sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim, meeting only two of the required three regulatory criteria. The AAO found that the submitted media articles were not 'about' the petitioner and were too dated to show sustained acclaim. While acknowledging the petitioner's contributions and reviewing activities, the AAO concluded he had not proven he was among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.