EB-1A Dismissed โ Physics (2022): did not establish sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim in the final merits determination. Although three criteria were met, the AAO determined that co-authoring articles and peer-reviewing are routine activities for research scientists. Furthermore, the petitioner did not specify his individual contributions within large collaborative projects or provide appropriate comparisons for his citation record to establish he was at the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.