EB-1A Dismissed โ Physiology Research (2024): the petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidentiary requirement of meeting at least three criteria. The petitioner, having met two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), failed to establish that she had made original contributions of major significance to her field. The evidence provided regarding her research's role in developing a drug was deemed insufficient to demonstrate the drug's actual impact or major significance within the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.