EB-1A Dismissed โ Pole And Aerial Sport (2024): the appeal was dismissed primarily on procedural grounds
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed primarily on procedural grounds. The AAO found that the petitioner failed to meet her burden of proof because, in her response to the Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), she submitted hundreds of pages of evidence without specifying how the new evidence applied to the regulatory criteria. The decision affirmed that it is the petitioner's obligation to organize and present their case clearly, and the Director was not required to guess how the evidence proved eligibility.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.