EB-1A Dismissed โ Public Health (2019): did not meet the minimum of three evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum of three evidentiary criteria. While she satisfied the criteria for judging the work of others and authoring scholarly articles, the AAO found she did not prove her original contributions were of 'major significance' at the time of filing. The evidence presented, such as an evaluation plan for tobacco control, showed potential future impact but did not demonstrate that it had already significantly influenced the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.