Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Radiation Oncology (2016): although the petitioner met the minimum of three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because although the petitioner met the minimum of three evidentiary criteria (judging, scholarly articles, high salary), the evidence in totality did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Her judging experience was deemed a routine professional obligation, and her publication record of three articles was not considered extensive enough to show a career of acclaimed work at the very top of the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Authorship Of Scholarly Articles High Salary Or Other Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.