dismissed EB-1A Case: Recruiting Management

identifying data deleted to 
prevent clezb: u;~u~dl~ant& 
invmian ofpersonal privacy 
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
- - -- 
SRC 07 016 52217 
Petition: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 
203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1153(b)(l)(A) 
IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
U 
ert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Appeals Office 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas 
Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal will be 
rejected. 
The petitioner is a recruiting management business which seeks to classifL the beneficiary as an "alien 
of extraordinary ability" pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the 
Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 11 53(b)(l)(A). The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained 
national or international acclaim necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary 
ability. 
The appeal was filed by who submitted a Form G-28, Notice of Enhy of Appearance as 
Attorney or Representative signed by the petitioner. indicates that he is a "consultant 
(International Business Support, LLC)." 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 I.l(f) states: 
The term attorney means any person who is a member in good standing of the bar of 
the highest court of any State, possession, territory, Commonwealth, or the District of 
Columbia, and is not under any order of any court suspending, enjoining, restraining, 
disbarring, or otherwise restricting him in the practice of law. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 292.1 (a)(6) encompasses the following type of foreign attorneys: 
Attorneys outside the United States. An attorney other than one described in Sec. 
l.l(f) of this chapter who is licensed to practice law and is in good standing in a court 
of general jurisdiction of the country in which he/she resides and who is engaged in 
such practice. Provided that helshe represents persons only in matters outside the 
geographical confines of the United States as defined in section 101(a)(38) of the Act, 
and that the Service official before whom helshe wishes to appear allows such 
representation as a matter of discretion. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 292.1(a)(4) defines an accredited representative as a person representing 
an organization described in 8 C.F.R. 292.2 who has been accredited by the Board of Immigration 
Appeals (BIA). The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 292.2 describes the processes by which the BIA (1) 
recognizes an organization as authorized to provide accredited representatives, and (2) accredits a 
person as a representative of a recognized organization. 
On May 29, 2008, this office issued a notice touoting the above regulations and advising 
that - according to the unchecked boxes on the Form G-28 and a review of the most recent 
Roster of Recognized Organizations and Accredited Representatives maintained by the Executive 
Office for Immigration and Review, available on the Internet at 
http://mv.usdoj.~r;o~~/eoir/sta~spub/reconitionaccreditationrostcr.pdf, was not an attorney or an 
accredited representative of an organization recognized by the BIA. was provided 15 days 
in which to reply and advised that failure to respond would result in the appeal being rejected as 
Page 3 
improperly filed. A copy of this letter was sent to the petitioner. As of this date, more than three 
months later, this office has not received a response. 
The appeal has not been filed by the petitioner, an authorized representative or any entity with legal 
standing in the proceeding, but rather by a consultant. Therefore, the appeal has not been properly filed 
and must be rejected. 8 C.F.R. 5 103.2(a)(2)(v)(A)(I). 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected.