EB-1A Dismissed โ Remote Sensing (2017): did not establish eligibility under at least three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility under at least three regulatory criteria. While the original director found the petitioner met the criteria for judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions, the AAO on review determined the evidence did not support a finding of original contributions of major significance. The AAO found the petitioner's citation record and recommendation letters were insufficient to prove his work had a major impact on the field as a whole.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.