EB-1A Dismissed โ Research Scientist (2005): the evidence provided did not meet the claimed criteria for
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the evidence provided did not meet the claimed criteria for extraordinary ability. The petitioner's academic fellowships and postdoctoral position were not considered nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence, but rather training and employment opportunities. Furthermore, his membership in the American Chemical Society was found not to require outstanding achievements, as it is a large professional organization with standard entry requirements.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.