Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Science And Engineering (2012): did not establish qualifying evidence for at least three of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide qualifying evidence for at least three of the required regulatory criteria. The AAO found that the petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and also failed to show an intent to continue working in their field in the U.S. Furthermore, submitted foreign language documents were not considered because they lacked the required certified translations.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Membership In Associations Participation As A Judge Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.