dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Sciences
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The petitioner failed to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision, as required, and did not submit a promised brief or additional evidence to support the appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Procedural Grounds For Summary Dismissal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF RยทA-P-N-P- Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: JUNE II, 2018 APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Sri Lanka, seeks classification as an individual of extraordinary ability in the sciences. Immigration and Nationality Act section 203(b)(l)(A), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(l)(A). This tirst preference classification makes immigrant visas available to those who can demonstrate their extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in their field through extensive documentation. The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-2908, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of the February 22, 2018, tiling date. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). Cite as Matter of R-A-P-N-P-, ID# 1559255 (AAO June II, 2018)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.