Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Sciences (2012): although the petitioner met the plain language of three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because although the petitioner met the plain language of three criteria, the evidence was found to reflect routine duties and accomplishments. The AAO concluded this evidence was not consistent with sustained national or international acclaim and did not demonstrate that the petitioner had risen to the very top of her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.