EB-1A Dismissed โ Sciences (2015): did not establish eligibility by meeting the requisite
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility by meeting the requisite three evidentiary criteria. The AAO agreed with the director that while the petitioner demonstrated participation as a judge of the work of others, he did not prove that his scientific contributions were of major significance to his field as a whole. Therefore, the petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and that he has risen to the very top of his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.