EB-1A Dismissed โ Sciences (2010): while the petitioner met the minimum threshold of three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because while the petitioner met the minimum threshold of three criteria, the evidence was not persuasive enough to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The AAO determined that the petitioner's accomplishments, such as judging and authoring articles, were routine for a postdoctoral researcher and did not indicate he had risen to the very top of his field, especially when compared to the more significant achievements of his references.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.