EB-1A Dismissed โ Sciences (2015): did not meet the minimum of three evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum of three evidentiary criteria. The AAO found that evidence of articles authored by the beneficiary and citations to his work did not satisfy the 'published material' criterion, as this requires material to be *about* the individual's work. Although the 'judging' criterion was met, the petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence for other criteria to establish the required sustained national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.