dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Sciences
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim by meeting at least three of the regulatory criteria. The AAO found that the evidence, such as a student thesis award, was not indicative of being at the very top of the field among experienced professionals. Additionally, the petitioner's role as a postdoctoral associate was not considered a leading or critical role for the employing institution.
Criteria Discussed
Prizes Or Awards Membership In Associations Original Contributions Of Major Significance Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.