EB-1A Dismissed โ Sciences (2005): did not meet the evidentiary requirements for the criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the evidentiary requirements for the criteria claimed. The evidence for awards was deemed insufficient, relying on an uncertified partial translation, and research grants were not considered prizes for past achievement. The petitioner also failed to establish major significant contributions, as witness letters were not sufficiently independent and there was no evidence of citations to his publications to show impact.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.