EB-1A Dismissed โ Sciences (2005): did not establish he met the minimum evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that he met the minimum evidentiary criteria. The submitted grants were not proven to be nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence, with one document lacking a certified translation and others being viewed as research funding rather than awards for past achievement. Furthermore, the evidence for original contributions, including witness letters and publications, was deemed insufficient to demonstrate a major impact on the field as a whole.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.