EB-1A Dismissed โ Sciences (2019): did not meet three of ten evidentiary criteria for the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required three of ten evidentiary criteria for the classification. The AAO agreed with the Director that the petitioner satisfied the judging and scholarly articles criteria, but found the evidence insufficient for the awards and original contributions criteria. A postdoctoral fellowship was deemed a training opportunity rather than an award for excellence, and the petitioner's publications and citations did not demonstrate contributions of major significance to the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.