Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Sciences (2019): the motion to reconsider was denied because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reconsider was denied because the petitioner did not establish an incorrect application of law or policy, but rather disagreed with the previous conclusions. The motion to reopen was denied because the new evidence submitted was insufficient to meet the criteria for published material, judging, or original contributions. Consequently, the petitioner still only met one of the three required evidentiary criteria.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Scholarly Articles Published Material About The Alien Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.