Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Sciences (2016): the motion to reopen and reconsider was denied, and the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen and reconsider was denied, and the underlying appeal was dismissed, because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility by meeting at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The AAO reaffirmed its prior decision that the petitioner only met two criteria (judging and authorship of scholarly articles) and did not sufficiently prove that their work constituted original contributions of major significance to the field as a whole.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Membership Published Material About The Alien Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.