Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Sciences (2015): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact, making only general claims of error. Even if the new evidence regarding the 'high salary' criterion was considered, the AAO found it insufficient as it lacked objective data comparing the petitioner's remuneration to others in the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
High Salary / High Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.