dismissed EB-1A

dismissed EB-1A Case: Sciences

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Individual ๐Ÿ“‚ Sciences

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because it was determined to be moot. The beneficiary had already adjusted to lawful permanent resident status through a different, approved immigrant petition, making further consideration of this appeal unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

Sustained National Or International Acclaim

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
1dentifyi.ng data deleted toted 
ent clear I)' unw~ 
::'00 ofpersotUU ~ 
PUBLtCCOpy 
FILE: 
INRE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U,S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Ma~sachLLsetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
Office TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 1 0 2.011 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)( I )(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 u.s.c. ยง 1153(b)( I )(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents 
related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised 
that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. 
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional 
information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. 
The specific requirements for filing such a request can be found at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5. All motions must be 
submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form 1-290B, Notice of Appeal or 
Motion, with a fee of $630. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. ยง I 03.5(a)( I lei) requires that any motion must be 
filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. 
Thank you, 
~lLu.-'>~ 
q~rry Rhew\J 
C Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the employment-based immigrant visa 
petition, which is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will 
be dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification as an "alien of extraordinary ability" in the sciences, pursuant to 
section 203(b)(I)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.c. ยง II53(b)(1)(A). The 
director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim 
necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
Review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicates that the 
filed another Fon]] 1-140 petition under a lesser classification, with receipt [JUI[Ju'el 
USCIS records further indicate that the director, Nebraska Service Center, approved the second petition 
on October 2, 2009. The alien subsequently filed a Form 1-485 Application to Adjust Status, receipt 
which was approved on January 28, 2010. Because the alien has adjusted 
to lawful permanent resident status, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed, based on the alien's adjustment to lawful permanent resident 
status. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.