dismissed EB-1A Case: Sciences

miif'ying data deleted to 
mvent clearly unwarranW 
inv~jsion of personal privacy 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
LIC COPY 
, d' 
FILE: EAC 03 139 52257 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: 2 6 Zfigj 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Administrative Appeals Office 
EAC 03 139 52257 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont Service 
Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 3 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability in 
sciences. The director determined that the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international 
acclaim requisite to classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
On Form I-290B counsel stated, "The Government erred as a matter of fact and law" and indicated that he would 
submit a brief and/or additional evidence to the AAO within 30 days. Counsel dated the appeal December 17, 
2004. As of this date, over eight months later, the AAO has received nothing further from counsel. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 3 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. Counsel here has not 
specifically identified any reason for the appeal and has not provided any additional evidence. The appeal must 
therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.