EB-1A Dismissed โ Scientific Research (2019): did not meet the minimum threshold of three evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum threshold of three evidentiary criteria. Although the petitioner satisfied the criteria for judging the work of others and for authorship of scholarly articles, they did not successfully demonstrate that their research constituted original contributions of major significance to the field. The AAO found that the provided citation numbers were not sufficient to prove that the petitioner's work had a major impact rising to the level of sustained national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.